The aim of the research was to make a sustainable review and analyze the existing battery tests for measuring physical fitness in kinesiology education by domains and to determine the qualitative differences between them. The aim is to determine the complexity and prevalence of certain tests, the time required to implement them and to determine whether the tests are aimed at health fitness or maximum athletic reach. To determine the difference between the variables, the content analysis method was used, and between the frequencies, the Hi-square test was used. Statistical significance was tested at the level of 𝑝 < 0.05%. Using the content analysis method, following available test batteries were extracted: Alpha-Fit, Eurofit, Fitnessgram, Norme and Crofit. The 35 extracted tests were analyzed and the tests from each domain were coded and analyzed based on the variables. Sample variables consist of the name of the battery tests, space, aids, time, performance and result. The results indicate that there is a significant difference in the representation of the number of domains for measuring the physical fitness of students among the analyzed test batteries. They also show that there is a difference in tests characteristic within each physical fitness domain. It is necessary to systematically change the existing battery of tests in accordance with modern goals and to encourage the use of tests that provide feedback on the health of students and not the maximum sports range. Thereby preference should be given to instruments based on modern technology because they allow the validity, accuracy and reliability of health feedback. The need for the level of physical activity to become an integral part of physical fitness testing is emphasized, given that it is a direct indicator of the quality of life and health of students.